<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Updated: Spears Confirmed, Silverstone Out, Chalke In, and why it&#8217;ll all be OK</title>
	<atom:link href="http://have-you-met-ted.com/2008/updated-spears-confirmed-silverstone-out-chalke-in-and-why-itll-all-be-ok/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://have-you-met-ted.com/2008/updated-spears-confirmed-silverstone-out-chalke-in-and-why-itll-all-be-ok/</link>
	<description>Have You Met Ted is info, news, discussion, reviews, music, quotes, and more from the best show on television.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 04:00:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: vogue</title>
		<link>http://have-you-met-ted.com/2008/updated-spears-confirmed-silverstone-out-chalke-in-and-why-itll-all-be-ok/comment-page-1/#comment-10648</link>
		<dc:creator>vogue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 16:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.have-you-met-ted.com/2008/updated-spears-confirmed-silverstone-out-chalke-in-and-why-itll-all-be-ok/#comment-10648</guid>
		<description>hi sarah chalke i love you in the move</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi sarah chalke i love you in the move</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RelevantNoise.com &#187; A Britney Comeback?</title>
		<link>http://have-you-met-ted.com/2008/updated-spears-confirmed-silverstone-out-chalke-in-and-why-itll-all-be-ok/comment-page-1/#comment-894</link>
		<dc:creator>RelevantNoise.com &#187; A Britney Comeback?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 15:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.have-you-met-ted.com/2008/updated-spears-confirmed-silverstone-out-chalke-in-and-why-itll-all-be-ok/#comment-894</guid>
		<description>[...] good thing for HIMYM, their ratings were up and people are talking. For a show that has been on the “endangered list”(and the upfronts are coming soon) positive chatter can go a long [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] good thing for HIMYM, their ratings were up and people are talking. For a show that has been on the “endangered list”(and the upfronts are coming soon) positive chatter can go a long [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://have-you-met-ted.com/2008/updated-spears-confirmed-silverstone-out-chalke-in-and-why-itll-all-be-ok/comment-page-1/#comment-685</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.have-you-met-ted.com/2008/updated-spears-confirmed-silverstone-out-chalke-in-and-why-itll-all-be-ok/#comment-685</guid>
		<description>@Thomas That&#039;s a great point. The actors on the show are becoming more and more recognizable and marketable. Now Josh Radnor needs a starring role. I vote for a bad-ass Tarantino action movie. Thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Thomas That&#8217;s a great point. The actors on the show are becoming more and more recognizable and marketable. Now Josh Radnor needs a starring role. I vote for a bad-ass Tarantino action movie. Thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://have-you-met-ted.com/2008/updated-spears-confirmed-silverstone-out-chalke-in-and-why-itll-all-be-ok/comment-page-1/#comment-683</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 07:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.have-you-met-ted.com/2008/updated-spears-confirmed-silverstone-out-chalke-in-and-why-itll-all-be-ok/#comment-683</guid>
		<description>A little off-topic but I would think CBS would want to hold on to &quot;HIMYM&quot; because it seems that Jason Segal might take off with &quot;Forgetting Sarah Marshall.&quot;  And Neil Patrick Harris does have &quot;Harold and Kumar 2.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A little off-topic but I would think CBS would want to hold on to &#8220;HIMYM&#8221; because it seems that Jason Segal might take off with &#8220;Forgetting Sarah Marshall.&#8221;  And Neil Patrick Harris does have &#8220;Harold and Kumar 2.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Coolest Gifts</title>
		<link>http://have-you-met-ted.com/2008/updated-spears-confirmed-silverstone-out-chalke-in-and-why-itll-all-be-ok/comment-page-1/#comment-650</link>
		<dc:creator>The Coolest Gifts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 02:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.have-you-met-ted.com/2008/updated-spears-confirmed-silverstone-out-chalke-in-and-why-itll-all-be-ok/#comment-650</guid>
		<description>I actually think Britney could (and I stress &quot;could&quot;) be okay.  She was surprisingly good years ago when she hosted SNL...it&#039;s just a matter of how crazy she actually is, and if she can pull it together for this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually think Britney could (and I stress &#8220;could&#8221;) be okay.  She was surprisingly good years ago when she hosted SNL&#8230;it&#8217;s just a matter of how crazy she actually is, and if she can pull it together for this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://have-you-met-ted.com/2008/updated-spears-confirmed-silverstone-out-chalke-in-and-why-itll-all-be-ok/comment-page-1/#comment-643</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.have-you-met-ted.com/2008/updated-spears-confirmed-silverstone-out-chalke-in-and-why-itll-all-be-ok/#comment-643</guid>
		<description>Ranier, I&#039;m glad someone picked up on that, it was an homage to Brunch.

Also, sorry I kept spelling your name wrong. I&#039;m dumb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ranier, I&#8217;m glad someone picked up on that, it was an homage to Brunch.</p>
<p>Also, sorry I kept spelling your name wrong. I&#8217;m dumb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ranier</title>
		<link>http://have-you-met-ted.com/2008/updated-spears-confirmed-silverstone-out-chalke-in-and-why-itll-all-be-ok/comment-page-1/#comment-642</link>
		<dc:creator>Ranier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.have-you-met-ted.com/2008/updated-spears-confirmed-silverstone-out-chalke-in-and-why-itll-all-be-ok/#comment-642</guid>
		<description>&#039;the alicia part&#039; &#039;the britney part&#039; ...That remind me of episode 2.03 Brunch xD

Haha that&#039;d be an awesome plot! Sarah being the biggest fan of Robin Sparkles, and she freaks out when she sees her like her character on Scrubs haha. I&#039;m still waiting for the RobinSparkles comeback

My votes are for
Britney is wrong for the show, but all the press will ultimately be good, making her casting forgivable (i really really really hope so)

And Alicia Silverstone because even when i love Sarah Chalke, Alicia seems perfect for Ted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;the alicia part&#8217; &#8216;the britney part&#8217; &#8230;That remind me of episode 2.03 Brunch xD</p>
<p>Haha that&#8217;d be an awesome plot! Sarah being the biggest fan of Robin Sparkles, and she freaks out when she sees her like her character on Scrubs haha. I&#8217;m still waiting for the RobinSparkles comeback</p>
<p>My votes are for<br />
Britney is wrong for the show, but all the press will ultimately be good, making her casting forgivable (i really really really hope so)</p>
<p>And Alicia Silverstone because even when i love Sarah Chalke, Alicia seems perfect for Ted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

